Politik Sebagai Gaya Hidup
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artikel ini berfokus pada politik sebagai gaya hidup dalam budaya kontemporer dan gelombang demokrasi liberal. Praktik politik sebagai gaya hidup ini mencerminkan revolusi globalisasi dari dunia maya dan budaya postmodern dalam landasan ideologis kapitalisme akhir. Praktik politik gaya hidup juga mendegradasi narasi besar politik dalam modernitas politik yang mengorientasikan tatanan politik dan prinsip-prinsip demokrasi rakyat dan mengubah narasi kecil politik dalam postmodernitas politik yang mengorientasikan kesadaran subjek secara absolut yang dikendalikan oleh hasrat dan insting. struktur kesadaran materialistis, hedonistik, konkumeristik dan konsumtivistik. Politik sebagai gaya hidup hadir dalam kehidupan sehari-hari baik di ranah publik maupun digital. Politik sebagai gaya hidup menggambarkan kontestasi, presentasi, pertunjukan dan simulasi yang akhirnya menjadi masyarakat dalam kondisi mayoritas diam. Politik sebagai gaya hidup harus direkonstruksi yang berorientasi pada makna sebagai manusia otentis secara rasional dan transendental.
This article focuses on politic as life-style in the contemporary culture and wave of liberal democracy. This political practice as life-style reflects globalization revolution from cyberspace and postmodern culture in the ideological foundation of late capitalism. The political practice of life-style also degrades political grand narrative in the political modernity which to orientates political order and the principles of peoples democracy and to changes political small narrative in the political postmodernity which to orientates absolutely subject consciousness whose controlled by desire and insting in the structure of materialistic, hedonistic, concumeristic dan consumtivistic consciousness. Politic as life-style presents in every day life both in public or digital spheres. Politic as life-style describes contestation, presentation, performance dan simulation that finally becomes peoples in the majority condition of silence. Politic as life-style has tobe reconstructed which to orientates in meaning as otentical human rationally and trancendentally.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Althusser, Louis. For Marx (London: Penguin Books, 1969).
Baudrillard, Jean. In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities or the End of the Social and Other Essays, terj. Paul Foss (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).
Brown, Wendy. “Power After Foucault” dalam John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig and Anne Phillips, ed, The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2006).
Bulkin, Farchan. “Pokok-pokok Pikiran Mengenai Kelas Menengah” makalah yang disampaikan pada PAIS (Percakapan Ahli Ilmu-ilmu Sosial) di Fisip-Universitas Indonesia pada 3-4 Oktober 1984.
Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle, terj. Ken Knabb (Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets, 2014).
Fidler, Roger. Mediamorfosis: Memahami Media Baru. Penj. Hartono H. (Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya, 2003).
Fine, Ben. The World of Consumption: The Material and Cultural Revisited (New York and London: Routledge, 2002).
Fukuyama, Francis. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy (New York: Macmillan, tt).
Habermas, Jurgen. Teori Tindakan Komunikatif, jilid 1. terj. Nurhadi. (Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana),2007.
Hadiwinata, Bob Sugeng. “Civil Society: Pembangun dan Sekaligus Perusak Demokrasi” dalam Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, No. 1. Vol. 9. Tahun 2005.
Hadiwinata, Bob Sugeng. Politics of NGO in Indonesia (Routledge: Curzon Research on Southeast Asia;3, 2003).
Hardiman, F. Budi. Demokrasi Deliberatif: Menimbang Negara Hukum dan Ruang Publik dalam Teori Diskursus Jurgen Habermas (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 2009).
Hardiman, F. Budi. Humanisme dan Sesudahnya: Meninjau Ulang Gagasan Besar Tentang Manusia (Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2012).
Hardiman, F. Budi. Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif (Yogyakarta: Kanisius),1993.
Huntington, Sammuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968).
Jensen, Mark. Civil Society in Liberal Democracy (New York: Routledge, 2011).
John, Peter. Local Governance in Western Europe (London: Sage Publications, 2001).
Kane, John. The Politics of Moral Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Katembula, Lengwe. “Participation of NGO in Social Development Process in Africa” a paper presented in Colloquium at The School of Social Work, University of Zimbabwe, 4 August 1994.
Lyotard, Jean Francois. The Postmodern Condition. Trans. George Bennington and B. Massumi (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984),
McKinnon, Andrew M. ”Opium as Dialectics of Religion: Metaphor, Expression and Protest”, dalam Critical Sociology Journal, No. ½. Vol. 31.
Newberry, Paul. A. Theories of Ethics (London: Mayfield Publishing Co, 1999).
Newman, Saul. Power and Politics in Poststructuralist Thought: New Theories of the Political (New York: Routledge, 2005).
Osborn, Reuben. Marxism and Psychoanalysis (New York: Dell Publishing Co, 1965).
Przeworski, Adam. Sustainable Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Sheuerman, William E.. Frankfurt School Perspectives on Globalization, Democracy and the Law (London and New York: Routledge, 2008).
Shields, Rob. “Spaces for the Subject of Consumption” dalam Rob Shields, ed, Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption (London and New York: Routledge, 1992).
Sorensen, Georg. Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi: Proses dan Prospek dalam Sebuah Dunia Yang Sedang Berubah. Pent. I. Made Krisna (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2003).
Sufyanto, Selebritisasi Politik: Kajian Dramaturgi, Habitus dan Tindakan Komunikatif Aktor Pemilu (Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015).
Suhelmi, Ahmad. Pemikiran Politik Barat: Kajian Sejarah Perkembangan Pemikiran Negara, Masyarakat dan Kekuasaan (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2001).
Surbakti, Ramlan. Memahami Ilmu Politik (Jakarta: Gramedia, 2010).
Suseno, Franz Magnus. 13 Tokoh Etika Sejak Zaman Yunani Sampai Abad Ke-19 (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1997).
Sutikno, Komunikasi Kritis: Rekonstruksi Demokrasi Politik di Indonesia (Lamongan: Pustaka Ilalang, 2016).
Sutikno, Komunikasi Politik Ulama: Studi Dramaturgi Politik dalam Pilkada (Surabaya: Tesis Master Komunikasi, Universitas Dokter Sutomo, 2009).
Thiele, Leslie Paul. Thinking Politics: Perspective in Ancient, Modern and Postmodern Political Theory (New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2002).
Wilhelm, Anthony G. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace (New York: Routledge, 2000).
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for A Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2019).