Recontextualization of the Words "Distance" and "Distancing" During the Covid-19 Pandemic
English
COVID-19 is a plague that has become a pandemic for the
world. Necessary, many researchers who conduct research to
understand about COVID-19, both medical and other scientific
disciplines such as language science. The purpose of this study
is to find out whether there is a contextualization of the words
DISTANCE and DISTANCING with SOCIAL kolokat. For
this reason, the mixed method is used to obtain coherent
results. The results of this study indicate that the T-score of
DISTANCING 16.1 and DISTANCE -14. This shows that the
word SOCIAL is more commonly used with the word
DISTANCING in corpora. The second finding is a recontextualization of the word DISTANCING in the negative
direction.
Keywords:
Corpus Based Analysis, Critical Strategies, COVID-19, Recontextualization
How to Cite
Recontextualization of the Words "Distance" and "Distancing" During the Covid-19 Pandemic: English. (2023). JELP Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.58518/jelp.v2i2.1801
Bartsch, S. (2004). Structural and Functional Properties of Collocations in English: A
Corpus Study of Lexical and Pragmatic Constraints on Lexical Co-occurrence.
Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Connolly, J. H. (2015). Recontextualisation, Resemiotisation and Their Analysis in Terms
of An FDG-Based Framework. Pragmatics, 24(2), 377-397
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods Approaches. New York: SAGE Publications.
Hanston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Linell, P. (1998). Discourse Across Boundaries: On Recontectualizations and The
Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse. TEXT and Interdisciplinary Journal
for the Study of Discourse.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press.
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced
Resource Book. New York: Routledge.
Salama, A. H. (2011). Ideologicaal Collocation and The Recontextualization of WahhabiSaudi Islam post-9/11: A Synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse
Analysis. Discourse & Society, 315-342.
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford:
Blackwell.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Works. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing
Corpus Study of Lexical and Pragmatic Constraints on Lexical Co-occurrence.
Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Connolly, J. H. (2015). Recontextualisation, Resemiotisation and Their Analysis in Terms
of An FDG-Based Framework. Pragmatics, 24(2), 377-397
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods Approaches. New York: SAGE Publications.
Hanston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Linell, P. (1998). Discourse Across Boundaries: On Recontectualizations and The
Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse. TEXT and Interdisciplinary Journal
for the Study of Discourse.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press.
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced
Resource Book. New York: Routledge.
Salama, A. H. (2011). Ideologicaal Collocation and The Recontextualization of WahhabiSaudi Islam post-9/11: A Synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse
Analysis. Discourse & Society, 315-342.
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford:
Blackwell.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Works. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing