THE CONCEPT OF NASKH MANSUKH TEUKU MUHAMMAD HASBI AL-SHIDDIQIE: A SOCIOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF KNOWLEDGE (QS ANALYSIS. ALBAQARAH: 106 IN THE TAFSIR AN-NUR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v8i2.4146Kata Kunci:
Hasbi As-Shiddiqiey, Nasikh-Mansukh, the Sociology of Knowledge.Abstrak
This article discusses the thought concept of Teuku Hasbi As-Shiddiqie who rejects the opinions of classical scholars regarding Naskh in light of the theory of sociological knowledge that focuses on shedding light on the background of his environment. The background of this research arose due to the debate among classical and contemporary scholars about Naskh Mansukh. Classical scholars accept it undoubtedly, while contemporary scholars tend to be contra. The method used in this research is Literature Study and the writing technique is descriptive-analytical which directly engages with the aspects of the text and context in Hasbi As-Shiddiqie's environmental background, such as Hasbi's arguments against Naskh, the social background of Hasbi's life (from his youth activities to just before his death), and the influence of sociological background on Hasbi's thoughts. The results of the research presented explain that Naskh according to Hasbi does not mean that it must erase and annul verses but can be reconciled or reinterpreted without having to be disregarded. The approach of Sociological Knowledge does not only address the existing textual meaning but also emphasizes the contextual meaning that occurs to humans through their historical facts. This study emphasizes that the concept of Naskh in the Qur'an is not solely a matter of canceling earlier verses and replacing them with later verses but can be realized by reconciling or interpreting and elucidating them so that the conflict between one verse and another finds common ground without needing to be eliminated.
Referensi
Abdelnour, M. G. (2023). The Qurʾān and the Bible: Abrogation (naskh) or confirmation (taṣdīq)? Religions, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070856
Abdul-Rahim, R. (2017). Demythologizing the Qur’an: Rethinking revelation through naskh al-Qur’an. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 7(2), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.7187/gjat122017-2
Adnir, F., & Syukri, S. (2020). Manhaj Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqie dalam bidang hadis: Metode, pemikiran, kritik ulama, serta kelebihan dan kekurangannya. Shahih: Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.51900/shahih.v3i2.8911
Alak, A. I. (2024). The impact of Islamic theories of revelation on humanist Qurʾanic hermeneutics. Studia Islamica, 119(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341484
Amir, S. B., Hilmi, A. B. A., Abdullah, M. B., & Norasid, M. A. (2024). The dynamism of social, literary, and hermeneutical streams in classical and modern Qur’anic exegesis. Al-Bayan, 22(2), 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-20240150
Anshori, M. (2019). Wawasan baru kajian nāsikh–mansūkh: Analisis pemikiran Maḥmūd Ṭāhā dan Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naʿim. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 4(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.v4i2.899
As-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (2009a). Ilmu-ilmu al-Qur’an (ʿUlūm al-Qur’an).
As-Shiddieqy, T. M. H. (2009b). Sejarah & pengantar ilmu al-Qur’an dan tafsir (H. F. H. As-Shiddiqy, Ed.; 3rd ed.).
Asman. (2021). The red yarn of contemporary Islamic law reform: A critical study of Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naʿim’s thought. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 21(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v1i1.4193
Ash-Shiddiqy, H. (2000). Tafsir al-Qur’an Majid an-Nūr (Vol. 1, pp. 264–265).
Aziz, T. (2018). Problema naskh dalam Al-Qur’an: Kritik Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqie terhadap kajian naskh. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v3i1.2286
Baranowski, M. (2019). Sociology of knowledge in times determined by knowledge. Society Register, 3(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.1.01
Burke, P. (2019). The history of knowledge: Social or cultural history? In Cultural history in France: Local debates, global perspectives (pp. 40–47). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295386-6
Burton, J. (2019). The sources of Islamic law: Islamic theories of abrogation. Edinburgh University Press.
Fadhilah, R. (2016). Konsep nasikh mansukh di era modern dalam perspektif Imam al-Ṭabāṭabāʾī. Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 8(2), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.34001/ijshi.v8i2.4726
Faruq, U. Al, Agustina, A., Hamida, S. D., & Hamna, N. (2024). Al-nāsikh dan al-mansūkh. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.47134/pjpi.v1i3.414
Fikri, R. (2021). Teori nasakh al-Qur’an kontemporer (Unpublished master’s thesis). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Gábor, T. (2019). Karl Mannheim as a transdisciplinary thinker and the problem of the sociology of intellectuals. Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, 63(1), 143–155.
Hammersley, M. (2022). Karl Mannheim’s Ideology and Utopia and the public role of sociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 22(2), 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X20986382
Hempel, D. (2019). From Bloch’s utopian surplus to Žižek’s fantasmatic spectre. Journal of Political Ideologies, 24(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2019.1631540
Hoenig, B. (2025). Karl Mannheim and the sociology of knowledge. In Research handbook on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 69–83). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376649.00012
Ichwan, M. N., Ming, D., & Sya’roni, M. (2025). Bridging tradition and modernity. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(Special Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021
Iman, F. N. (2019). Mitologi naskh intra-Qur’anic. Nun: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir di Nusantara, 4(2), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v4i2.66
Irfanuddin, M., & N, A. M. (2023). Nâsikh Mansûkh Dan Implementasinya dalam Tafsir Al-Qur`an ul Majid An-Nūr Karya Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy. (2023). Bersatu: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, 1(3), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.51903/bersatu.v1i3.319
Langermann, Y. T. (2024). Naskh (“abrogation”) in Muslim anti-Jewish polemic. Religions, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050547
Pfadenhauer, M., & Berger, P. L. (2017). The new sociology of knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315133485
Razali Ibrahim, M. S. (2023). The concept of marriage from Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqiey’s perspective. Miqot: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 47(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v47i1.1078
Remmling, G. W. (2020). The sociology of Karl Mannheim. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074335
Soleman, A., & Tohis, R. A. (2022). Science feminis: Sebuah kajian sosiologi pengetahuan. Spectrum: Journal of Gender and Children Studies, 1(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.30984/spectrum.v1i2.171
Syaifudin, M. (2019). Prof. T. M. Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqi and his views on nasikh and mansukh. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 140, 48–50. https://doi.org/10.2991/iscogi-17.2019.12
Ummam, N. I., Zulliandi, Y. B., & Zarnuji, M. I. (2024). Ash-Shiddiqiey’s criticism of the nāsikh–mansūkh theory. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v23i1.456
Vandenberghe, F. (2025). A diagnosis of the sociology of our time. In Research handbook on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 23–44). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376649.00009
Vasegh, M., & Mohammadi, A. (2022). Epistemological criticism on sociology of knowledge. GeoJournal, 87(6), 4719–4739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10526-y
Yaşar, M. A., & Nas, T. (2022). Abu Ubayd’s understanding of naskh. Hitit Theology Journal, 21(1), 689–716. https://doi.org/10.14395/hid.1064547
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2.png)
