Proses peer review is carried out to ensure the quality and substance of the articles in the published journals. This process is an objective process carried out by all scientific journals. Reviewers and Editors at the Medina Journal have an important role to ensure the continuity of this process with the following procedures:

Review Process Type: Madinah:JSI implements a anonimous peer review system. Under this system, the identity of the peer reviewers is not disclosed to the author, while the reviewers are aware of the author’s identity. This approach is intended to maintain confidentiality, encourage honest feedback, and ensure a fair evaluation process based on the manuscript’s scholarly merit.

First Evaluation. The editor conducts an initial evaluation of all newly submitted articles. At this stage, the Editor checks the scope of the journal, plagiarism, and writing rules. Articles that are far from the original provisions, may be rejected at this stage. Articles that pass the check will be sent to  the Reviewer.

Plotting Reviewer. The reviewer's assignment  to an article is based on the reviewer's field of expertise .

Reviewer Report . Reviewer Assigned to provide feedback/reviews on articles by considering originality, structure and flow of writing, code of ethics for scientific writing, ownership of clear results and support for what is concluded, references to relevant previous research. 

Processing Time Review. The length of  the review process  depends on the response given by each Reviewer. Madina:JSI implements a policy of giving a total of three (3) weeks to  the Reviewer from the beginning of assignment. The reviewer's assignment  may be diverted if they do not respond within one to three weeks. 

Final Report. Based on the reports and recommendations from the peer reviewers, the Editor will make a final decision, which may be: Accepted, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Rejected
Authors will receive notification of the decision, along with comments from the peer reviewers (if any), via the OJS system or email. The final decision for publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief.

Final Evaluation. Before an article is published, editors may submit a request for improvements to the grammar or images used in the article (if needed).