Metode Pembelajaran dan Implikasinya Terhadap Keterampilan Pemahaman Teks Bacaan Bahasa Inggris
This research is meant to explore the differences of reading comprehension skill on English
which was taught using different instructional methods (CIRC Vs Conventional) on the female
learners grade VIII. The analysis was nonequivalent control group design. There were 115
learners of two different junior high school participated which was classified into two groups
namely two (2) experimental groups and two (2) control groups. The data analysis was
Independent Sample T-Test. The finding shown; (1) statistically, there wasn’t significant
difference on English reading texts comprehension before being taught using CIRC method
with mean 61.9153 versus conventional method with mean 61.4444.( 2) Statistically, there’s
significant differences on English reading comprehension between the experimental groups
and control groups with average mean 79.1864 for CIRC and mean 60.2143 for conventional
method. Based on this research, CIRC method is so effective method that it can develop and
improve students’ reading comprehension ability
Acicgos, KU. Cooperative Learning; Theory, Research and Practice. Malatya: Ugurel Publications, 2022.
Al Odwan, T.H. The Effect of the Directed Reading Thinking Activity through Cooperative Learning on English Secondary Stage Students’ Reading Comprehension in Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (February 2012), 139-151.
Ali, M.F. 2001. The Effect of Using the Jigsaw Reading Technique on the EFL Pre-service Teachers’ Reading Anxiety and Comprehension. Journal of Education College, 3, 1-19.
Burden PR. And Byrd DM. Methods for Effective Teaching. Second Edition. Boston, London: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.
Degeng, I.N.S. Bahan Ajar Metodologi Penelitian. Bahan Ajar tidak diterbitkan. Malang: 2010
Degeng, I.N.S. Strategi Pembelajaran; Organisasi isi dengan model elaborasi. Malang: IKIP kerjasama dengan BPIPTPI, 2011.
Durukan, E. Effects of CIRC Tehnique on Reading-Writing Skill. Educational Research and Reviews, 6 (January, 2011), 101-110. http://DOI: 10.4236/ce.2014.517178.
E.Coelho. Cooperative Learning; Foundation for a Communicative Curriculum Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.
F.Frazee, BM. And Rudnnitski, RA. Integrated Teaching Methods; Theroy, Classroom Applications and Filed-Based Connections. USA: Delmar Publisher, 1995.
Gall, MD and Borg, WR. Educational Research; an Introduction. 7Th edition. Boston: PEarson Education, Inc. 2003.
Jalilifar, A. The Effect of Cooperative Learning Techniques on College Students’ Reading Comprehension. Science Direct System, 38, (2009), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.009.
Johnson, DW. And Johnson, H. Learning together ans Alone; Cooperation, Competition and Individualization, 3th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc, 1991.
Long, M. H. Naturational Constraints on Language Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, (2019), 251-285.
Raj, K. Cooperative Instructional Strategies and Performance Levels of Students in Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Education and Science, 3 (Februari, 2012), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322/03.02.05.
Slavin Roberts E and Stevens RJ. The Effect of CIRC on Academically Handicapped and nonHandiccaped Students Achievement, Attitudes, and Meta-Cognition in Reading and Writing. Elementary School Journal, 8 (April, 2015) 24-29.
Slavin, Robert E. Cooperative Learning; Theory, REsearch, and PRactice London: Allyn and Bacon, 2005.
Zuo, W. The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Improving College Students Reading Comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (August 2021), 986-989. http://DOI:10.4304/tpls.1.8.986-989