Al-Manhaj Dan Al-Ṭariq Dalam Metodologi Tafsir
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the differences between al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in the methodology of interpretation. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of these terms. A literature review approach was employed, analyzing relevant scholarly sources on the topic. Content analysis was conducted to compare the definitions and usage of al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in various tafsir works. The findings reveal that although al-manhaj and al-ṭariq have distinct appearances, they share the fundamental meaning of being methods or approaches to achieve a goal. However, their usage and emphasis differ in the field of tafsir methodology. Al-manhaj is closely related to the writing style, interpretive school, and general form of interpretation adopted by a mufassir and their tafsir book. On the other hand, al-ṭariq pertains to the research methods and steps used as a practical implementation of the manhaj. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the nuanced differences between al-manhaj and al-ṭariq in tafsir methodology. It highlights the importance of considering these terms in the field of interpretation. By clarifying their meanings and usage, this study provides valuable insights for scholars and researchers in the field of tafsir. It serves as a foundation for further exploration and discussion on the topic, ultimately enhancing the knowledge and understanding of tafsir methodology.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afifah, Farida Nur. “Fanaticism of Madzhab in Interpretation: Study of The Book of Aḥkam Al-Qur’an By Al-Jaṣṣaṣ.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 28, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i2.9618.
Akbar, Hidayatullah Ismail dan Ali. Pengantar Tafsir Maudhu’i. Pekanbaru Riu: Pustaka Riau, 2012.
Al-Kkalidi, Salah Abd al-fattah. Ta’rif l-Darisin Bi Mnhaj Al-Mufassirin. Damaskus: Dar al-Qolam, 2008.
Anwar, Abu. Ulumul Qur’an. Bandung: Amza, 2005.
Arifin, Nabila El Mumtaza, Luqmanul Hakim, and Faizin Faizin. “Studi Intertekstualitas Tafsir Al-Thabari Dalam Tafsir Ibnu Katsir Tentang Kisah Bani Israil Tersesat Selama Empat Puluh Tahun.” An-Nida’ 44, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24014/an-nida.v44i1.12503.
As-Suyuthi, Jalaluddin, and Jalaluddin Muhammad Ibnu Ahmad Al-Mahally. “Tafsir Al-Jalalain.” Tafsir Jalalain (Terjemah), 2015.
Fadli, Muhammad Rijal. “Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.” HUMANIKA 21, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075.
Fauziah, Debibik Nabilatul. “Metodologi Tafsir Asy-Sya’râwî.” Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 6, no. 02 (2021).
Ghufron, Muhammad. ULUMUL QUR’AN. Yogyakarta: PT. Teras, 2013.
Iqbal, M. “Metode Tafsir Ahkam Ash-Shabuni Tafsir Ayat Al-Ahkam Dan Al-Qurthubi Al-Jam’I Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Landraad 1 (2022).
Karimah, Fatimah Isyti, and Iwan Caca Gunawan. “Manhaj Tafsir Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Quran Karya Muhammad Husain Thabathaba’i.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 2, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i1.15813.
Karman, Supina dan. Ulumul Al-Qur’an Dan Metode Tafsir. Bandung: Pustaka Islamika, 2002.
Mamasoni, Muhammad Subhi. “Uslub Al-Qur’an: Studi Uslub Taqdim Wa Ta’khir Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Al-Ma’any: Jurnal Studi Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab 1, no. 1 (2022).
Maqsood Hidary, Sher, and Ziauddin Haneef. “Obligatory Will in the Civil Code of Afghanistan: Analysis, Sharia Verification, and Case Solutions.” Addaiyan Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences 2, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.36099/ajahss.2.3.3.
Mokhtari, M H. “The Exegesis of Tabatabaei and the Hermeneutics of Hirsch: A Comparative Study.” PQDT - UK & Ireland, 2007.
Munawwir, Ahmad Warson. Al-Munawwir Kamus Arab-Indonesia. Surabaya: Pustaka Progresif, 1997.
Nur Alfiah. “Israiliyyat Dalam Tafsir Ath-Thabari Dan Ibnu Kastir.” Tafsir Hadis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, no. 106034003549 (2010).
Nur Dzulhijati, Putri Amelia. “METODOLOGI ZAMAKHSYARI TENTANG PENGGUNAAN ILMU LUGHAH/BAHASA DALAM TAFSIR AL-KASYSYAF.” AT-TAISIR: Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies 3, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.51875/attaisir.v3i2.138.
Pasya, Hikmatiar. “Studi Metodologi Tafsir Asy-Sya’rawi.” Studia Quranika 1, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v1i2.841.
Ramadhan, Suci, and Fiki Khoirul Mala. “Tafsir Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an by Thabathabai: Analysis of The Relationship Between Zalim and Syirk Meaning in Surah Al-An’am Verse 82.” Dialogia 20, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v20i2.3909.
Rifaldi, M, and M S Hadi. “Meninjau Tafsir Al-Jami’Li Ahkami Al-Qur’an Karya Imam Al-Qurthubi: Manhaj Dan Rasionalitas.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 1, no. 1 (2021).
Rohman, Abdul, Ahmad Jalaluddin Rumi Durachman, and Eni Zulaiha. “Menelisik Tafsir Al-Jâmi’ Li Ahkâm Al-Qurân Karya Al-Qurthubi: Sumber, Corak Dan Manhaj.” Jurnal Kawakib 3, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24036/kwkib.v3i2.70.
Rohmanan, Mohammad, and M. Lytto Syahrum Arminsa. “Metode Tafsir Al-Baghawi Dalam Kitab Ma’a>lim Al-Tanzi>l.” Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits 14, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v14i1.4480.
Rohmanan, Mohammad, and M Lytto Syahrum Arminsa. “Tafsir Al-Baghawi: Metodologi, Kelebihan Dan Kekurangan.” Al-Dzikra Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur an Dan Al-Hadits 14, no. 1 (2020).
Roni, Muhammad, and Ismail Fahmi Arrauf Nasution. “The Legality Of Miras (Khamr) in Al-Quran Persfective (Comparative Study of The Tafsir Al-Maraghy, Al-Misbah, and Al-Qurthubi).” FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 7, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v7i1.3685.
Samsi Tsauri, Sidiq, Ahsin Sakho Muhammad, and Adha Saputra. “CORAK TAFSIR BALAGHI (Studi Analisis Tafsir Al-Kassyaf ‘An Ghawamidh At-Tanzil Wa ‘Uyun Al-Aqawil Fii Wujuh At-Ta’Wil Karya Abu Al-Qasim Az-Zamakhsyari).” Zad Al-Mufassirin 3, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v3i1.24.
Samsurrohman. Pengantar Ilmu Tafsir. Jakarta: Amzah, 2014.