IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING PRINCIPLE IN THE SOROGAN METHOD FOR THE FATHUL QARIB TEXT AT PESANTREN: A MULTI-SITE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58518/darajat.v9i1.5029Keywords:
Assessment for Learning, Sorogan Method, Learning, PesantrenAbstract
Sorogan is a learning practice unique to Pesantren but few studies have examined sorogan as an assessment technique. This study aims to describe the application of the principles of assessment for learning in the implementation of the sorogan method for the Fathul Qarib textbook and to analyze the similarities and differences in its implementation. A qualitative research approach with a multi-site research design at the Pesantren Mahir Arriyadl Ringingagung and the Pesantren Fathul Ulum Kwagean. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation of the sorogan implementation. The results indicate that the principles of assessment for learning are present in the implementation of the sorogan method for the Fathul Qarib text, such as clarifying learning objectives, questions and discussions, feedback, as well as peer assessment and self-assessment. The sorogan method at both Pesantren shares similarities in the muraja’ah activities and immediate feedback. The differences are evident in the approach used, namely an individual approach at the Pesantren Mahir Arriyadl and a collaborative approach at the Pesantren Fathul ‘Ulum. These differences have implications for the patterns of interaction between teachers and students, the pace of learning, and the forms of reinforcement of students’ understanding.
References
Adriantoni, Afri Rahmat, Apriyanti Safitri, and Maryulis. “Urgensi Asesmen Formatif Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Abad 21.” Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang 11, no. 02 (May 2025): 221–29. https://doi.org/10.36989/DIDAKTIK.V11I02.6005.
Cholilah, Zahirotu, Idrus Muchsin Bin Agil, and Uin Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. “Implementation of The Sorogan Method in Nahwu Learning Using The Yellow Book at Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikam Jombang.” LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran 5, no. 1 (March 2025): 374–83. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v5i1.4558.
Flórez, María Teresa, and Pamela Sammons. “Assessment for Learning: Effects and Impact.” CfBT Education Trust, 2013, 1–32. http://cdn.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2013/r-assessment-for-learning-2013.pdf%5Cnhttp://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED546817.
Hidayah, Susilo, Mohammad Asrori, and Alfin Mustikawan. “Asesmen Pembelajaran Agama Isam Dalam Kurikulum Integratif: Studi Pada Lembaga Pendidikan Formal Pesantren.” Jurnal Pendidikan 14, no. 1 (January 2026): 119–33. https://doi.org/10.36232/JURNALPENDIDIKAN.V14I1.2114.
Husen, Kemal, Ari Abdi, and Muhammad Zaironi. “Implementasi Deep Learning Dalam Kurikulum Pesantren Melalui Metode Sorogan Dan Bandongan Di Pesantren An-Nur 2.” Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 1 (January 2026): 6458–69. https://doi.org/10.61104/ALZ.V4I1.4163.
Ismail, Seyed M., D. R. Rahul, Indrajit Patra, and Ehsan Rezvani. “Formative vs. Summative Assessment: Impacts on Academic Motivation, Attitude toward Learning, Test Anxiety, and Self-Regulation Skill.” Language Testing in Asia 2022 12:1 12, no. 1 (September 2022): 40-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4.
Ja’far, Ja’far. “Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating: Management of Teaching the Kitab Kuning in Pesantren.” Jurnal Inovatif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 4, no. 2 (July 2025): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.38073/JIMPI.V4I2.2611.
Ma’ruf, A. Husein, and Jasminto Jasminto. “Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Pesantren Tradisional Di Era Millenial.” Piwulang: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 2, no. 1 (September 2019): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.32478/piwulang.v2i1.301.
Mas’ud, M. PI Mas’ud, Tamrin Subagyo, and M. Fahmi Arifin. “The Existence of The Sorogan Method in The 21st Century: Its Effectiveness, Role, And Relevance In Modern Education.” Leadership: Jurnal Mahasiswa Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 6, no. 2 (June 2025): 193–206. https://doi.org/10.32478/wm1cn365.
Nasarudin et al. Studi Kasus Dan Multi Situs Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Edited by Susanto Alpino. CV. Gita Lentera, 2024.
Pachón-Basallo, Mónica, Jesús de la Fuente, María C. González-Torres, José Manuel Martínez-Vicente, Francisco J. Peralta-Sánchez, and Manuel M. Vera-Martínez. “Effects of Factors of Self-Regulation vs. Factors of External Regulation of Learning in Self-Regulated Study.” Frontiers in Psychology 13 (August 2022): 968733–968733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968733.
Saifuddin, and Siti Zuliatin Maghfiroh. “Penerapan Metode Sorogan Dalam Pembelajaran Kitab Fathul Qorib Santri Pondok Pesantren.” Jurnal Cendekia Media Komunikasi Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam 14, no. 02 (October 2022): 290–302. https://doi.org/10.37850/CENDEKIA.V14I02.345.
Suresman, Edi, Achmad Faqihuddin, Jenuri, and Mulyana Abdullah. “From Sorogan to Digital Learning: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis of Pesantren Learning Models.” Cogent Education 12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2580776.
Ulfa, Maria. “Metode Sorogan Kitab Untuk Pemahaman Nahwu (Imrity) Pondok Pesantren Assunniyah Kencong Jember.” Al-Fathin: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab 5, no. 01 (July 2022): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.32332/al-fathin.v5i01.5202.
Wiliam, Dylan. Embedded Formative Assessment. 1st ed. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press, 2011.
Yin, Robert K. Studi Kasus Desain Dan Metode. 15th ed. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
