The Re-emergence of Classical Exegesis in the Contemporary Era: Between Revivalism, Epistemological Continuity, and Intellectual Stagnation

Authors

  • Ahmad Bahrudin Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darussalam, Bangkalan, Indonesia
  • M. Tohir Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darussalam, Bangkalan, Indonesia
  • Abd Muin Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darussalam, Bangkalan, Indonesia
  • Deshinta Arrova Dewi INTI International University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v9i1.4908

Keywords:

Neo-classical exegesis, Classical tafsir, Contemporary Qur'anic interpretation, Epistemological continuity, Tafsir historiography

Abstract

The persistence of classically oriented Qur'anic exegesis in the contemporary period presents an important yet underexplored phenomenon in Qur'anic studies. While modern tafsir has generally been associated with reformist, contextual, and interdisciplinary approaches, a number of contemporary exegetical works continue to preserve classical interpretive structures and methodologies. This study investigates the re-emergence of classical exegesis through a comparative analysis of three major twentieth-century commentaries: Tafsir al-Munir by Wahbah al-Zuhaili, al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir by Muhammad al-Tahir Ibn Ashur, and Khawatir Hawl al-Qur'an al-Karim by Muhammad Mutawalli al-Sha'rawi. Employing qualitative library research with descriptive-comparative analysis, the study examines their exegetical methodologies, interpretive sources, systematic structures, and socio-intellectual orientations. The findings demonstrate that all three commentaries preserve essential characteristics of classical tafsir—including the predominance of the tahlili method, extensive engagement with earlier exegetical authorities, philological analysis, and comprehensive verse-by-verse interpretation—while simultaneously incorporating selective responses to contemporary intellectual and social concerns. These findings challenge the conventional binary classification that sharply separates classical and contemporary tafsir. Instead, the study argues that these works represent a form of neo-classical exegesis, characterized by epistemological continuity rather than methodological stagnation. Consequently, the re-emergence of classical exegesis should be understood neither merely as a revivalist movement nor as evidence of intellectual decline, but as a dynamic strategy for preserving the authority of the classical exegetical tradition while negotiating the demands of modernity. This study contributes a new theoretical perspective by proposing neo-classical exegesis as an intermediary category within the historiography of Qur'anic interpretation.

References

Ahmad, H. (2023). Mapping Neo-Modern and Postmodern Qur’ānic Reformist Discourse in the Intellectual Legacy of Fazlur Rahman and Mohammed Arkoun. Religions, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14050595

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).

Al-Dhahabī, M. Ḥ. (2000). Al-tafsīr wa al-mufassirūn. Maktabah Wahbah.

Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and work plan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Al-Hamdi, M. I. (n.d.). Al-taqrīb li-tafsīr al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Dār Ibn Khuzaymah.

Al-Khalidi, Ṣ. A. al-F. (2008). Taʿrīf al-dārisīn bi-manāhij al-mufassirīn. Dār al-Qalam.

Al-Salam, A. al-M. A. (1982). Ittijāhāt al-tafsīr fī al-ʿaṣr al-rāhin. Maktabah al-Nahḍah al-Islāmiyyah.

Al-Sulaymani, D. K. H. (2014). Al-tajdīd fī al-tafsīr fī al-ʿaṣr al-ḥadīth: Mafhūmuhu, ḍawābiṭuhu, wa ittijāhātuhu. Umm al-Qurā University.

Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. J. (2001). Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān. Markaz li Buḥūth wa al-Dirāsāt al-ʿArabiyyah wa al-Islāmiyyah.

Arni, J. (2013). Metode penelitian tafsir. Pustaka Riau.

Asad, T. (1986). The idea of an anthropology of Islam. Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.

Ayazi, M. ʿA. (n.d.). Al-mufassirūn: Ḥayātuhum wa manāhijuhum. Al-Wizārah al-Thaqāfah wa al-Irshād al-Islāmiyyah.

Baihaqi. (2016). Studi Kitab Tafsir al-Munir karya Wahbah al-Zuhaili dan contoh penafsirannya tentang pernikahan beda agama. Analisis, 16(1).

Calder, N. (1993). Tafsir: From Tabari to Ibn Kathir. In G. R. Hawting & A. Shareef (Eds.), Approaches to the Qur'an. Routledge.

Calis, H. (2022). The theoretical foundations of contextual interpretation of the Qur’an in Islamic theological schools and philosophical Sufism. Religions, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020188

El Shamsy, A. (2020). Rediscovering the Islamic classics: How editors and print culture transformed an intellectual tradition. Princeton University Press.

Fari’, M. ʿA. A. (1998). Manhaj Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī fī tafsīrihi li al-Qurʾān al-karīm: Tafsīr al-Munīr. Al al-Bayt University.

Goldziher, I. (1955). Madhāhib al-tafsīr al-Islāmī (A. H. Al-Najjar, Ed.). Maktabah al-Muthannā.

Görke, A., & Pink, J. (Eds.). (2014). Tafsir and Islamic intellectual history: Exploring the boundaries of a genre. Oxford University Press.

Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press.

Halim, A. (2014). Kitab Tafsir al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir karya Ibnu ‘Asyur dan kontribusinya terhadap keilmuan tafsir kontemporer. Jurnal Syahadah, 2(1).

Ibn ʿĀshūr, M. Ṭ. (1984). Al-Taḥrīr wa al-tanwīr. Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li al-Nashr.

Jansen, J. J. G. (1980). The interpretation of the Koran in modern Egypt. Brill.

Laila, A. N., & Ochviardi, D. (2024). Corak tafsir maqāṣidī dalam Tafsir al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir (JIQTA), 2(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.36769/jiqta.v2i2.440

Mahmoud, A. (1984). The Qur'an and its interpreters. State University of New York Press.

Mentari, R. Y. (2011). Penafsiran al-Sya’rawi terhadap al-Qur’an tentang wanita karier (Undergraduate thesis). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Muhammad, A.-T. M. (2012). Manhaj al-Shaʿrāwī fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-karīm. University of Oran.

Pink, J. (2019). Muslim Qur'anic interpretation today: Media, genealogies and interpretive communities. Equinox.

Riḍā, M. R. (1979). Tafsīr al-Manār. Dār al-Manār.

Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Saleh, W. A. (2004). The formation of the classical tafsir tradition: The Qur'an commentary of al-Thaʿlabī. Brill.

Saleh, W. A. (2018). The Oxford handbook of Islamic theology. Oxford University Press.

Ṣāliḥ, M. ʿA. al-Q. (n.d.). Al-tafsīr wa al-mufassirūn fī al-ʿaṣr al-ḥadīth. Dār al-Maʿrifah.

Zubairin, A., Muid, N., & Musa, K. (2024). The maqāṣidī approach in Islamic legislation according to Ibn ʿĀshūr in Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Ilmu Ushuluddin, 11(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.v11i1.41648

Zuhaili, W. (2009). Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-ʿaqīdah wa al-sharīʿah wa al-manhaj. Dār al-Fikr.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Bahrudin, A., Tohir, M., Muin, A., & Dewi, D. A. (2026). The Re-emergence of Classical Exegesis in the Contemporary Era: Between Revivalism, Epistemological Continuity, and Intellectual Stagnation. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir, 9(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v9i1.4908