Negosiasi Lokalitas dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur'an: Strategi Stilistika Hamka dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqan.v9i1.5003Kata Kunci:
Stilistika local, Tafsir Al-Azhar, Hamka, Tafsir Al-Qur'an, Islam IndonesiaAbstrak
Hubungan antara universalitas Al-Qur'an dan keragaman budaya masyarakat Muslim merupakan salah satu isu penting dalam studi Al-Qur'an kontemporer. Meskipun kajian mengenai tafsir kontekstual telah berkembang pesat, perhatian terhadap bagaimana lokalitas dikonstruksi melalui organisasi stilistika dalam wacana tafsir masih relatif terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana Hamka menegosiasikan lokalitas dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar melalui strategi-strategi stilistika yang menjembatani makna Al-Qur'an dengan konteks sosial-budaya Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis studi kepustakaan dengan analisis tekstual yang dipadukan dengan pendekatan stilistika dan kontekstual. Analisis difokuskan pada pilihan leksikal, dialog lintas agama, dan narasi sosial-historis yang membentuk konstruksi makna tafsir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya tiga dimensi utama stilistika lokal. Pertama, lokalisasi leksikal, yaitu penggunaan kosakata bahasa daerah Indonesia untuk menjembatani konsep-konsep Al-Qur'an berbahasa Arab dengan kesadaran linguistik masyarakat lokal. Kedua, lokalisasi dialogis, yaitu penggunaan perbandingan lintas agama sebagai strategi menjelaskan konsep tauhid dalam masyarakat Indonesia yang plural. Ketiga, lokalisasi historis, yaitu pemanfaatan pengalaman sejarah kolektif Indonesia, terutama memori kolonial, untuk memperkuat relevansi etis ajaran Al-Qur'an. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa lokalitas tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai latar sosial penafsiran, tetapi juga sebagai mekanisme stilistika internal yang membentuk struktur wacana tafsir. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, penelitian ini menawarkan konsep Stilistika Lokal Tafsir Al-Qur'an (Local Stylistics of Qur'anic Exegesis) sebagai kerangka analitis baru untuk memahami bagaimana wahyu dinegosiasikan melalui mediasi leksikal, dialogis, dan historis dalam tradisi tafsir vernakular.
Referensi
Asad, T. (1986). The idea of an anthropology of Islam. Occasional Papers Series. Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.
Azra, A. (2006). Indonesia, Islam, and democracy: Dynamics in a global context. Equinox Publishing.
Badawi, Z., & Mohammed, A. F. (2021). The relevance of Muhammad Abduh's thought in Indonesian tafsir: Analysis of Tafsir Al-Azhar. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(1), 113–148.
Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
Bauer, K. (2022). The Qur'an and its readers worldwide: Contemporary perspectives on interpretation. Equinox Publishing.
Bauer, T. (2021). A culture of ambiguity: An alternative history of Islam. Columbia University Press.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press.
Clooney, F. X. (2010). Comparative theology: Deep learning across religious borders. Wiley-Blackwell.
Clooney, F. X. (2013). Comparative theology and inter-religious dialogue. In C. Cornille (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue (pp. 51–63). Wiley-Blackwell.
Cornille, C. (Ed.). (2013). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell.
Cornille, C. (2013). Conditions for inter-religious dialogue. In C. Cornille (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue (pp. 20–33). Wiley-Blackwell.
Cornille, C. (2013). The im-possibility of interreligious dialogue. Crossroad.
Daneshgar, M. (2020). Studying the Qur'an in the Muslim academy. Oxford University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Feener, R. M. (2013). Social engineering through Shari'a: Islamic law and state-directed da'wa in contemporary Aceh. University of Hawai'i Press.
Firdausiyah, U. W. (2021). Modernisasi penafsiran Al-Qur'an dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar karya Buya Hamka. Jurnal Ulunnuha, 10(1), 65–77.
Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The ideology of religious studies. Oxford University Press.
Gusmian, I. (2013). Khazanah tafsir Indonesia: Dari hermeneutika hingga ideologi (Edisi revisi). LKiS.
Hamka. (2015). Tafsir Al-Azhar. Gema Insani.
Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974). The venture of Islam: Conscience and history in a world civilization (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
House, J. (2015). Translation quality assessment: Past and present. Routledge.
Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge University Press.
Kadir, M. S. M. P., & Abd, K. A. (2024). Kajian metodologi Tafsir Al-Azhar karangan Buya Hamka. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development (JISED), 9(64), 250–265.
Keane, W. (2007). Christian moderns: Freedom and fetish in the mission encounter. University of California Press.
Kirin, A. (2020). Pandangan Hamka terhadap Pengkajian Ulum Al-Quran dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Contemporary Studies (AHCS), 1(1).
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.
Martin, R. C. (Ed.). (2004). Approaches to Islam in religious studies. University of Arizona Press.
Menchik, J. (2016). Islam and democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
Messick, B. M. (1993). The calligraphic state: Textual domination and history in a Muslim society. University of California Press.
Mohammad Khoiril Anwar, W., Dozan, W., & Maliki. (2022). Paradigma Tafsir Nusantara. UIN Mataram Press.
Muhammad, M., Mahmudi, Z., Hamdan, A., Alahmadi, F. M. S., & Rusdi, M. (2024). Jewish Antagonism as Portrayed by Hamka in the Book of Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 24(02), 513-532.
Pink, J. (2010). Tradition and ideology in contemporary Sunnite Qur'ānic exegesis: Qur'ānic commentaries from the Arab world, Turkey and Indonesia and their interpretation of Q. 5:51. Die Welt des Islams, 50(1), 3–59.
Pink, J. (Ed.). (2019). Muslim Qur'anic interpretation today: Media, genealogies, and interpretive communities. Equinox Publishing.
Rahman, P. (2018). Hermeneutika Al-Qur'an Tafsir Al-Azhar (Analisi Hermeneutis Ayat-ayat Akidah dan Ibadah). Medina-Te : Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(2), 59–72.
Ricci, R. (2011). Islam translated: Literature, conversion, and the Arabic cosmopolis of South and Southeast Asia. University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. University of Chicago Press.
Riddell, P. G. (2001). Islam and the Malay-Indonesian world: Transmission and responses. Hurst & Company.
Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge.
Saeed, A. (2013). Reading the Qur'an in the twenty-first century: A contextualist approach. Routledge.
Saleh, W. A. (2010). Preliminary remarks on the historiography of tafsīr in Arabic: A history of the book approach. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 12(1–2), 6–40.
Saleh, W. A. (2019). The formation of the classical tafsir tradition. Brill.
Shah, M. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of Qur'anic studies. Oxford University Press.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Wales, K. (2014). A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2.png)
